Thread: "100,001" Replies (Wrestling Forum)
View Single Post
Old 09-13-2016, 06:51 PM   #28604
Simple Fan
Let me talk to ya
 
Simple Fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,749
Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noid View Post
I completely get what you are saying. But, that being said, the RAW/SmackDown dynamic is the only way it makes sense to have more than one set of belts. You can't have a WWE World Title and a WWE Universal Title and it make sense. But you can have a RAW World Title and a SmackDown World Title if each are treated as separately sanctioned promotions.
But there are WWE World and WWE Universal titles and it makes sense. What doesn't make sense is having the Women's and Tag divisions just be Raw and Smackdown branded. WWE Universal Women's Champion sounds a lot better than WWE Raw Women's Champion. Same thing for the Tag division, it just make the title sound like it's something. Raw and Smackdown just sounds generic and uncreative to me.
Simple Fan is offline   Reply With Quote